Finding the source of a car’s incessant rattling doesn’t have to be an expensive affair. The problem is that fixing emissions problems on a vehicle doesn’t have a high perceived value the car might not feel any different, so people don’t want to deal with it.” The environmental impact is enormous, he notes, but a car that won’t run is far more likely to get you to fix it then one that is emitting something you can pretend isn’t there. “The program initially played a significant role in getting heavy polluters off the road. Of course, the questions are many:Īlso read: Seven of the worst things you can do to damage your car If an emissions reading can’t be obtained, you’ll be told to go drive around for a few days and essentially build up a user history – get your car to run through a complete drive cycle. The problem is your car won’t be in test mode if the battery was recently disconnected, drained or boosted, or your computer codes were cleared during a recent repair. The Drive Clean test reads the emissions computer OBDII (on-board diagnostics) system as you drive, your computer cycles through numerous self-tests and stores that information. A check engine light could mean anything. A failed test means you can’t renew your vehicle registration until it’s made to produce cleaner exhaust. Cars built from 1988 to 1997 still use the older tailpipe testing method model years before 1988 do not need to be tested. This change narrowed the margins for a pass and resulted in an increase in failures, a bump from the previous five per cent to eight to 10 per cent, depending on whom you ask. The test was changed in January 2014 from a tailpipe emissions test to one that now reads your on-board computer. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. For vehicles less than seven years old, the cost is in the thousands of dollars to pick up a problem, as only one to two per cent of vehicles fail for legitimate reasons.” That means 20 vehicles are inspected to identify one bad one – it costs over $700 to pick up a polluter. Read more: Ignore that check engine light at your own perilĪccording to George Iny, president of the Automobile Protection Association (APA), “failure rates for cars less than 10 years old are now below five per cent. Any car under seven years old, unless it’s the current model year, must also be tested if it is being sold - even those that are essentially brand new. Every two years, owners have to arrange a visit to an accredited Drive Clean facility and pay $30 (it used to be $35) to get a clean bill of health. Initially requiring tests on cars every second year once they were just three years old, it was soon nudged to cars over seven. Since its inception, the Drive Clean program has been more thorns than roses. Article content A diagnostic technician uses a laptop computer to diagnose and repair the brake system on a 2010 Toyota Prius in the repair shop of a Toyota dealership. In short, this decision may benefit a bunch of people in the short term, but in the long run it'll likely cost a whole bunch more.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The E-Test setup that will fail a vehicle for unrelated reasons only serves to make myopic decisions like this possible by a government that interestingly enough bans its officials from mentioning climate change. then yes absolutely it's a valid fail and the vehicle needs to be serviced. If the Engine light code showed something like Air Evap Sensor, Cylinder Misfire, Fuel Too Lean/Rich. But what is the engine code - outside air temperature monitor for the optional nice display that has NOTHING to do with the operation of the engine, exhaust or any other components related to any relevant environmental concern. As we know, E-Test WILL Fail because of that engine light being on, and even if that light is cleared the engine must run for a certain number of KMs to reset for the test. Here's the scenario, a relative has a vehicle that keeps getting an engine light come up. Ya know, as critical as I am at the fuckery of Ford and his cronies - there is some logic behind the E-Test getting scrapped for non-commercial vehicles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |